Net66 SEO: Matt Cutts says IPv4 and IPv6 sites are not Duplicate Content

This is something that shouldn’t be of concern to most of you yet as a lot of ISPs haven’t yet made the jump to IPv6 connections for websites.

The difference between the two is that IPv4 connections consist of 4 groups of 3 digits. Such as your regular IP address a la 123.12.123.12 which is your standard IP address. IPv6 addresses have a much different configuration consisting of letters and numbers. Although with IPv6 addresses if you have more than four zeros in a row you can omit them.

So, in theory if you did have an IPv6 address, you have two versions of your site on two different connections. Which usually would account to duplicate content. Thankfully Google has devised a way to tell whether the same site is on a different connection rather than a different host/domain (which would be a duplicate content issue).

Matt Cutts explains it all here:

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Link Building – What Not to Do Post Penguin

Anchor Text - What not to do. Optimise Your Anchor Text

To a degree you must still occasionally include the keyword in one or two of your links. But if you’re looking to rank yourself for “cheap building services” or something similar. Then you should not have a high percentage of keyword anchors of “cheap building services”. You should also avoid having a lot of variation of the same anchor text. For instance having this variety:

Cheap Building Services
Low Cost Building Services
Cheap Builders
Low Builders

This will still alert Google that what you’re doing isn’t the best practice. You see the anchors are still over optimised because Google understands that all the anchor text pertains to the same keyword, and that you’re trying to manipulate the algorithm by changes the anchors text.

You should always try to create links with brand optimisation, use part of a sentence or just use your URL. All a better option than overusing “cheap building services” as your anchor.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Google Updates it’s Links Tool in Webmaster Tools

People have often been frustrated by the lack of link data under the “Links to my Site” option on Google Webmasters tools. There were never that many, and weren’t updated all that often.

But now it seems that in the background, Google had been planning one big update, rather than consistently updating them. And now it looks like the big one has been released.

In a Blog Post that Google recently released, they’ve announced that there will now be a “much broader, more diverse cross-section of links”. I’ve checked this out this morning and found that there are a lot more links now showing up in the links to your site section.

What this also means is that there will be a wider range of top level domains showing up, rather than your more country specific ones. So rather than the focus being on .co.uk domains if your website targets England. It will now show many more domains form the outside of the UK. Such as .coms .nets etc.

However Google have still limited the amount of links that they will show, which is still 100,000. They have made it clear though, that the types of links that will show up will be much different.

Meaning that if you ever have engaged in bad linking practices, you will be able to get a better scope of your linking profile, and tidy it up quicker and more efficiently than if you were to have the previous set of results.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Matt Cutts on How to Recover from Panda

February 2011 changed the search engine listings forever. That was because it was this month that Google first released their Panda update. The main aim of this update was to evaluate the quality of content on website. This was because at the time people were neglecting to really write content, focussing instead on how many keywords they were place in their text.

This naturally lead to keyword stuffing and degraded the quality of content as better phrased sentences were always sacrificed to include keywords instead. Take the two sentences below as an example:

A) We’re a SEO Company Manchester who offer a wide range of Manchester SEO Services.

B) Based in Manchester, we’ve been offering SEO services in the county for years now.

Sentence A is clearly based only for fitting in the keywords relating to roofing in Manchester. You can tell as it doesn’t quite read well. It’s the omission of the “in” between company and Manchester that just leaves the sentence a little off.

Sentence B however has been written properly without the intention of forcibly including in the keywords. So sentence B, according to Panda, has more quality so should rank higher.

Content quality seems to be the only way to combat the Panda update. As seen in Matt Cutts video below:

So now, if you do have a website that’s been hit by the Panda update. You now know how to combat it.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: A New Player in the Digital Marketing Game? Enter Adobe Target

TargetWe all know Adobe as the company that created Flash, Photoshop, Fireworks and of course the much loved Adobe PDF reader. So why has this creative company suddenly decided to release a new product designed specifically to help business owners understand the complex world of digital marketing.

But further than that, it also has the best interests of the end user in mind too. Not only will helping the business owner/SEOer improve the digital marketing aspect of the website. But tidying up all the onsite issues will surely increase the benefits of the website as a whole, thus, creating a more enjoyable experience for the end user.

It also deals with optimisation issues that some business owners can find confusing. They may know everything about how to whiten teeth, but when it comes to analytics, they will know nothing about this subject. So can get confused with the difference between unique visitors and regular visitors, bounce rate and time on site and the myriad of other statistics Google display through their analytics software.

With an online presence being a massive tool in revenue for businesses; more and more owners, marketing execs, accountants and anyone who has something to do with the website will be wanting to understand where their revenue is coming from, and how the website has attracted it. This way they can make an informed decision on whether or not each marketing avenue is worth pursuing
or not after analysing how much business each stream has brought to the site.

This software also goes beyond mere analytics and offers targeting, with the chance to set up favourite audiences so you can make the most of your online market. They further offer a step by step process, so that even the most novice digital marketer can have the chance to get a grip of their digital marketing campaign and steer it in the direction they want.

You can see the video that Adobe have released below:

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Google Potentially Rolling out an Update – Keeping Quiet

Google PandaAs is Google’s wont, it seems that they’ve released another update for their search algorithm. And sticking in line with their “We won’t confirm updates after Panda”, they won’t confirm anything. But large spikes in MozCast (a forecast for activity on search engine forums) suggest that there’s been spikes in this forecast.

Usually this happens when Google do release an update and SEOs up and down the country see a change in their rankings and or traffic. So far, the dates where chatter has been at it’s highest have been the 21st of August and the 4th of September.

We’ve yet to hear from Google and it doesn’t look like they’ll be commenting any time soon. But the sheer volume of chatter on such SEO forums makes it look to me that this was no mere fluctuation. This was something big, but as we’re unlikely to hear anything from Google, we’re just going to have to wait until the dust has settled and we can really analyse the facts and figures from the big change.

It could be something to do with the Panda update, which deals with quality issues of websites. Or it could even be something to do with the Penguin update, that examines in detail the links pointing to your website.

So have you seen any changes in your rankings or traffic?

Net66 SEO: Having a Manual Action Penalty Removed Doesn’t Help Rankings

Well, not instantaneously anyway. We’ve seen it a lot over the past year where people claim their website suddenly drops for all it’s rankings. Its traffic subsequently follows. So what is it in the first place that causes their sites to drop?

Usually it’s some form of manual action that Google applies to the website due to it violating one of Google’s stringent and vague Webmaster Guidelines. The usual line is that their links weren’t completely in line with Google’s rules, sorry, guidelines, and that they clean them all up, submit a resubmission request and huzzah! No more manual action.

They give it a week and see no return to their previous levels of traffic and rankings. So what’s the problem? Well, it just seems that although your penalty has been lifted, it’s more of a “we wont punish you further” rather than “we’ll fix your rankings”.

After all, would you learn your lesson if you could break the guidelines, rank well, get found out, have a manual action penalty, get within the guidelines again, and be restored? It’d be open season for trying out black hat results if you knew you could try anything with impunity knowing you could remove it and simply be restored to where you were.

So what are your thoughts on this? Do you think traffic and rankings should be restored straight away?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Mozilla Moves to Block Cookies on Sites

Back in 2011, Google decided that it was going to encrypt all search results for people who were already signed into their Google Account. On the surface this was great,you search is more secure, anonymous and whole lot more bountiful privacy bonuses.

One of the drawbacks however, only if you’re in the internet marketing business, is that when this was introduced, a lot of results in a lot people’s Google Analytics account started to be displayed as “Not Provided”. Much to the irk of people who relied on that data to measure just how successful their SEO campaigns had been.

This wouldn’t be a problem in most cases, however one study has suggested that up to 40% of data that come through Analytics now descends into this inescapable pit of Not Provided. So that’s nearly half of all data an SEO receives will be nullified. And now Mozilla with it’s blocking of Cookies looks set to only increase this number.

It will do this if it decides that the Google search cookie isn’t beneficial to the user, and decides to block it. That’s 20% of all search traffic GONE if Mozilla Press forward with this. “Well that’s no good” I hear you cry, my sentiments exactly. But there is something you can do to help. There’s a petition going round that you can sign. Set up by the Interactive Advertising Bureau, you can sign this petition here, I already have.

So do you think Mozilla will pull the plug on the Google Cookie?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Is PageRank Dead? No New Updates for 6 Months

deadly-98846_640PageRank has long been the go to tool for an instant look at a website’s credibility. Basically, the higher the number (1-10 scale) then the higher the trust and therefore quality of the website. That’s not to say this isn’t a flawed metric though, far from it.

New websites always have no PageRank. That’s not to say it starts at 0, it starts at n/a. Completely without a PageRank. You then have to build the trust of Google in your website by adhering to it’s stringent, if ambiguous, Website Quality Guidelines. You can do this by various ways with the two most popular being link building and producing fresh quality content.

If Google see’s your website is getting a lot of links then it will know that that website is worth linking to. These links could be directories, blogs, press releases or anything with a link to your website. The most organic of these is to attract links by publishing great content. Great content will get shared all over every social media channel, as well as be the subject of many other blog posts.

So is it dead?

Technically, no. But technically the Isle of Man could still be at conflict with Germany over WWI. So that’s not really saying much. But in reality, Google hasn’t updated PageRank for over 6 months now. The last update was in February 2013. That means that any site created after Feb 2013 won’t have a PageRank. Even though the website could have established itself in Google, risen to the top of the rankings and become a market leader.

So who’s to say that it isn’t dead if that can happen?

What do you think?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Google Asking you to Recommend Good Websites for Search

People have long complained about being unable to break into the top of Google’s SERPs simply because of the fact that although you have a better website and provide a better service, they spend more on SEO than you.

Well all that is set to change (maybe) with Google now asking SEO’s to send websites to Google that they think are first page worthy, but currently aren’t on the first page due to the high paying optimised websites. It was actually a Tweet by Matt Cutts that revealed this news, and, the link to where you can recommend your websites.

Here’s what the Tweet said:

 

This has thrown up a question for me though, with the massive amounts of competition out there, the fact that anyone can submit to this leaves it open to exploitation. Especially when you consider that the majority of people follow Matt Cutts are SEOs who would love to show off their work.

It could also open the doors to black hat techniques such as submitting a website 200 times from different IPs to make it look like 200 people like your site. So what do you think the reasoning behind this is? Do Google want us to do their Jobs for them? Is this a trap? Or do they genuinely want good sites recommended?

What do you think?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 Social Media: Gifs Set to Return to Facebook

Now I bet you’re wondering “what does he mean return?”, but in Facebook’s early days they did indeed allow for Gifs to be posted on Facebook and retain their animation. This is way back when they were battling MySpace for Social Media supremacy. In the midst of this battle however Facebook decided to stop support for Gifs automatically playing on their website.

The reason for this being that MySpace had exploded into reams and reams of sparkly, low grade, clipart-esque gifs for absolutely anything. Personally I didn’t like them as they got so out of hand. I also think Facebook saw this coming and by the time MySpace was drowning in a sea of sparkly names and tinkerbells, Facebook retained it’s clean and “cool” image.

Thus, Facebook edged ahead in the war and the rest is history. But now it looks like Facebook is set to change that history, not, so that we can all have flaming versions of our names on our profile, but because the very nature of gifs has evolved. In the time of the Social Media wars, gifs were very small, often only consisting of a few kilobytes. Gifs these days are images that people use to display their emotions, feelings or thoughts by way of a short animation look.

And Facebook have teamed up with a company called Giphy, who provide us with the gifs that Facebook will support. N.B. Facebook isn’t adding native support for gifs, it will only display them if they come from Giphy. And even then it won’t play them automatically in your news feed, you’ll need to click on them and enter the “theatre” mode to view them. Much in the same way you would view a short video.

Have you tried this yet? Do you think this is a wise move for Facebook or not?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: The Keyword Tool is Dead. Long Live the Keyword Planner

RIP Keyword ToolSo, the keyword tool has finally said it’s last hurrah and been replaced by the new Keyword planner. To start with, the keyword tool was quite an excellent tool designed for PPC Specialists, but used by SEOs nonetheless. Reason being, it was the closest thing anyone had to getting traffic estimates for certain phrases, especially when you consider that you had local and global monthly estimates.

You could also add broad match or exact match phrases to the same set of results, which would give a more in depth look at who was searching what, in what volume, and present the figures side by side. Anyone could use this tool too, even without having to sign into a Google account, you just had to fill in a captcha.

So here’s where the keyword planner differs straight away. First of all you DO need to sign up for a Google Account when using the Keyword Planner, drawing the ire of many a marketer. I’m sure they all have Google Accounts already, it’s just frustrating when you need information quickly and you have to fiddle about signing into things. Plus if you want to talk to a client and use the keyword planner, they’re not always going to have a Google account themselves so this could throw a spanner in the works.

Secondly, you have to view exact match and broad match keyword statistics on different pages. Which limits your ability to check keywords side by side for the difference in statistics between broad and exact.

Also, you now can’t filter results by “Closely Related”. This always provided more enhanced results when you were looking for phrases related specifically to one subject. A move that has been remedied straight away by Google, such was the force of the backlash. Google now say that they will be reinstating the “Closely Related” tool, at some point in the future.

It isn’t all doom and gloom though, as there have been some improvements to the old tool such as the fact that there are more geographic targeting tools. Allowing people planning Local SEO campaigns to break down targeted locations more specifically. You can also bundle together these new geographic targets to get even better results.

You can also upload more keywords of your own with with the limit being much higher than it used to be. You can now upload up to 10,000 keywords.

A nice new feature is that you get ad groups suggested to you. Sort of a quick fix for keywords relating to what you’re looking for. These groups come with an average cost per click and an average monthly traffic, indicators of what you can expect from this ad group. You also get to have a look at which keywords are in the group so you pick and choose the ones you want.

So although some features of the old keyword tool will be missed, you’ve got the keyword planner to look after you and although you might not love it yet, I’m sure you’ll come to.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

 

Net66 SEO: Link Building Dos

Find Unlinked Brand Mentions & Logos

If people are talking about your company on the web, you need to be aware of it. So why not run a search for you company name and contact all the places where your company is mentioned and where this mention isn’t linked to your Website. If it’s someone you know I’m sure a quick fire email will help get you that link, but you may have to work harder if you’re mentioned on another website without the link.

For logos you could search an image of your logo and then select the “visually similar” option on Google Image Search. There you could easily ask website owners to give you a link, or at least customise your Alt Text.

Telling Great Stories

Content is king! We all know that, and have done for some time. So why you wouldn’t spend a long time on your content building strategies seems strange. Rather than publish blog post after blog post without really getting into it. Spend one week where instead of half an hour at the end of the day to publish 5 blog posts, you use that time to instead create genuine, compelling content that will get shared and linked to.

A story is a great way to do that and is one of the most organic ways to get links to your site.

So there are a couple of tips to help you on your way with Link building.

 

Net66 SEO: Has there Been a Google Update?

Word on the forums seems to suggest an update affecting quite a lot of sites around the 21st and 22nd of August. Although the forums are relatively quiet (it is summer and I’m sure a lot of people are on holiday) there were spikes of traffic on both the 20th and the 21st where people were obviously talking about something.

But was it an update?

I’ve checked a few sites and some seem to have really increased whilst others have just hit an absolute average (Analytics shows a near enough straight line of traffic). Although traffic has seemed to fluctuate, there has not been a massive change in rankings. Yes there’s the usual fluctuation but nothing that would make me worried.

There’s quite a few ideas going round the web now as to what Google may have done to cause such a spike in conversation. But until we find out more of the effects of this update we’ll just have to wait and see.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

 

Net66 SEO: Is Google Deliberately Harming Organic Results?

First of all, The Fold, is what’s immediately viewable on your screen once you’ve performed your internet search (Googled something). If you have to scroll down to view past the paid for content and Google’s own maps service, what does it say about Google’s attitude towards the SEO industry?

We’re all working hard to stay within Google’s strict guidelines, and now it looks like soon enough organic listings will be third in line in results displayed on the SERPs. This cam about because of a new feature Google have implemented. Which means when you run certain searches on Google, what you see straight away is:

> A Carousel. The only purpose this seems to have, is to promote you to refine your search. Each image on the carousel is tied to a different Google search so if you search Hotels (in the example image) each image at the top will have a different search attached to it. Such as “Boutique hotels”, “5 Star Hotels” etc.

> Google Ads. In the bottom left of our example image you can see the bottom left is dominated by Google’s Adwords. A larger than average box ensures that it takes up all the space it can.

> Google Maps. Although we set up Google Maps originally, we have no say whether or not our maps will be chosen with no real way to optimise them. This, again, relies solely on Google.

See the example image for the search “hotels” below:

googles-destroying-seo

 

So what do you think about this new first page Dominance by Google? Is this a deliberate attempt to discourage the SEO Industry? Or is this just simply Google trying to improve search results for us?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Matt Cutts Reiterates +1s have no Direct Impact on Rankings

Matt CuttsIt’s been touted for a long while that Google takes Social Signals into account for it’s rankings. With that in mind, would Google’s own Social Network be a better platform to have your content shared on that other networks?

The response was prompted mainly by the fact that Moz had published a couple of studies that showed a massive correlation between the numbers of Google +1s and rankings. The more +1s something had, the higher it ranked.

But Matt Cutts was quick to point out that correlation doesn’t imply causality, deeming this the politest way to debunk the myth. He also added, more in reference to Moz’s study of Facebook Likes, that if you create compelling and great content, naturally people are going to take it and share it and link to it.

Implying that it isn’t due to the likes and +1s that the content ranks, it’s down to the actual content itself. It just happens to attract links organically. He also stated:

“But that doesn’t mean that Google is using those signals in our ranking, rather than chasing +1s of content, your time is much better spent making great content.”

So what do you believe? The cold, hard facts of Moz. Or the genial face of Matt Cutts?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Generate Ideas for Content the Easy Way

Ok, maybe not easy, as there is some work involved. I simply mean you don’t have to sit alone in a room, lit solely by your blank computer screen as you scratch your head for inspiration. I’ve actually done that a few times before thinking “There has to be another way”, and thankfully, there was. See the tips below:

Read User Comments

Writers Block

If you’ve written blog posts in the past then you’ll usually get one a two comments agreeing or disagreeing with what you’ve written. That’s not to say right or wrong, there are many more than 50 grey areas in SEO these days, and that’s where you’ll get an idea from.

If someone has challenged you on a blog post you’ve written, you can either take inspiration from them and see whether you can write a blog post from their view. Or you can dedicate a whole blog post to slam dunking their argument into the bin. It’s up to you.

Use Existing Customers

This can be worked in a few ways. If you’ve had a great success story recently with one of your clients, brag about it. Why not? You’ve put in the hard work, determination and man hours, so a little recognition is what you deserve. Plus this puts your work right in the shop window, giving you something to show off to potential new clients.

Also, you could ask some of your clients for a review of your product or service. You can then thicken this out into a blog post where you agree, disagree and applaud your clients review on the matter. This again puts you in the shop window, as people can see you’re understanding and appreciative of the feedback you have from your clients.

LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

If you’re proficient in Social Media then you should be on all of these platforms and better still, you should have networked with several other companies who are all in similar industries to you. This way you can peruse their updates and wait for inspiration to strike.

This could be critiquing what they’ve said on a certain matter, or even identifying yourself with what they’ve said, but go into further detail than they have. If they’ve mentioned something along the lines of one topic, this could set the cogs in your head whirring off on a different tangent, one you could write a blog about.

Follow these tips and you should find yourself with plenty to write about, saving yourself from the dreaded writers block.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 Google: Google to Respond to Quick Questions Personally with Search Results

I encountered a problem recently when I booked a flight. I wanted to make sure we were going to the right terminal and unfortunately this meant going to my emails, digging out the flight number and then searching that. Well all this is set to change with Google wanting to answer such questions as “Is my flight going to be late?” with a quick answer in their Search Results.

This works by using data collected from you being signed into your Google account, as well as information from the web. So if I had asked my phone “What terminal do I need to go to?” and was signed in to my Android Phone, it could find the flight number in my emails and then search the web for information about that flight. Combining both of these we’d be able to get the answer we wanted with minimal hassle.

Quite similar to Google Now, but Google want to push this out on all platforms turning Google Search into more of a personal assistant. And it works with much more than flights too. You can check the status of your deliveries by having that delivery information stored in your emails, and then entered on the relevant delivery website to find out where your package is. Pretty clever.

It can also help you with the answers you might be looking for that are stored in your Google calendar. Such as “Do I have any meetings today?”. I’m sure there are going to be many and varied applications for this feature and all them as useful as the next.

What do you think?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey