Net66: Google Plus Could Start Charging for Vanity URLs

google-Plus-iconIt’s a strange concept but now a new one. As with everything you upload to Social Media sites, although you’re uploading your own content, as soon as it hits their servers they can do with it pretty much what they want.

Even if you own it, and especially if you have intellectual property rights on it, you give Facebook and all the companies they own the right to use it. Here’s an exerpt from their terms:

“you specifically give us the following permission, subject to your privacy and application settings: you grant us a non-exclusive, transferable, sub-licensable, royalty-free, worldwide license to use any IP content that you post on or in connection with Facebook (IP License).”

So, unless you delete your content, Facebook can use it however they want. Even if they use it for their commercial gain and give you nothing, you’ve let them as you’ve agreed to their terms.

With Google Plus, they have equally totalitarian terms and conditions when it comes to their new custom URL feature. As we all know, URLs on Google+ aren’t the prettiest of things. For example, my own is: https://plus.google.com/100119952662552310660/posts

Hardly a reference to myself. But now Google+ allows you to create custom URLs, but under their terms a copy of which is as follows:

“Google+ Custom URLs Terms of Use

When you claim and use a custom URL, you must follow the Google Terms of Service, the Google+ User Content and Conduct Policy, and the Google+ Pages Additional Terms of Service (if applicable), and the following policies:

We reserve the right to reclaim custom URLs or remove them for any reason, and without notice.
Custom URLs are free for now, but we may start charging a fee for them. However, we will tell you before we start charging and give you the choice to stop participating first.
Don’t include words and phrases in your custom URL that would violate the Google+ User Content and Conduct Policy
If you violate our policies or terms of service we may take a variety of actions, including suspending your access to Google+ and your use of custom URLs.”

I’ve highlighted the main issues here. Although you may think you’ve laid a claim to your new Google Plus URL, and you can then spend money promoting this and having it added to your website, business cards, flyers and other marketing items, Google can still strip you of it. Without warning or notice and for no reason, the injustice! Then, they have the cheek to ask you for money to get it back.

Of course this isn’t a tactic Google are likely to employ, I’m merely highlighting a worst case scenario. Still, it does give you pause for thought. Do you think Google will start charging for vanity URLs?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66: Google Honours Remembrence day with Simple Home Page

Every year on the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month, people up and down the country stop what they’re doing and pause for one or two minutes to remember the soldiers of war.

In the USA this is veterans day, in the UK and the Commonwealth it is remembrance day. To commemorate this day with a mark of respect of it’s own, Google has added a poppy to it’s home page. See the tribute below:

Remembrance Day

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66: Google Doodle Becomes Insight Into Your Own Mind

Have you seen Google’s Doodle today? If you have, have you seen into yourself? I ask as Google’s Doodle is an ink blot test that psychiatrists used to get into your head. The would show you a blot of ink which would look ambiguous. The way you perceived the blot would then give the psychiatrist an insight into the way you think, enabling them to get on your level and help you out. All theoretical of course. Here’s an example inkblot:

Ink blot 1

I did’t really see much in this one. Maybe two sort of pseudo elephants or something. I gave it another go:

ink blot 2

This one was much clearer though, as far as I could tell, it was some form of stag. You can see it’s two large eyes at the bottom and then its antlers at the top. Yes of course I’m joking. It’s twin dinosaurs balancing on balls.

Clearly this test wasn’t intended to be a serious test, and if you don’t believe me and can see real meaning in the above two images, please tell me what the rest are:

Ink Blot 3

 

Ink Blot 3

 

Blog Post by Greg McVey

Net66: Google Clears up Mystery Barge

If you’re unaware of what this mystery barge is, you can see a picture of it below. It’s been the source of quite a lot of speculation recently with the most commonly touted suggestion of the barges being off shore data centres.

Google Barge

The suggestion of off shore data centres raised quite a lot of concern with a few people suggesting that Google could use these data centres to escape US Law. As the barges were moveable, they could be floated into international waters and therefore a law unto themselves.

Google of course denied this. In fact, it’s not to be anything like that. They released a statement laughing off some of the wilder suggestions which apparently included the insinuation that they were housing the last living dinosaur. Full Statement:

“Google Barge … A floating data center? A wild party boat? A barge housing the last remaining dinosaur? Sadly, none of the above. Although it’s still early days and things may change, we’re exploring using the barge as an interactive space where people can learn about new technology.”

Rather than answer most questions it does seem to have prompted more. Especially with the incredibly vague “interactive space”. And just what is this new technology? Is it somewhere where people can go and test a Google Car or Google Glass?

Blog Post by Greg McVey

Net66: Google Auto Complete Gets a Bashing

As with most things concerning Google, no matter how good it’s service is, there are always some bugs and people who notice them. One thing however that doesn’t seem to be a bug, but Google still gets criticised for, is it’s auto complete feature.

It’s been getting a lot of criticism at high levels with even the UN running a campaign for women’s rights using the feature. The reason Google has been used is not only down to the fact that it’s the biggest search engine out there. But more to do with the fact that Google aggregates data to come up with its instant suggestions.

Here’s the advert that is causing so much of a stir:

UN Campaign

So how have these results come about? Google stores every single search made on their search engine. They measure the words used and the position in the sentence used. They then count the words, they count the sentences, then they will count the first two words used, then the first second and third words used and so on and so forth.

Then they’ll begin to examine how many times each word positioned second, is used after the first word in the sentence. Then after word one, in our example “women”, the word “shouldn’t” will then be suggested.

Now the complaints being levied are two fold on this account. People are blaming Google for suggesting such things as “Women shouldn’t vote”, but at the same time, it’s us users who are making those searches. An argument also exists that Google is in effect finishing our sentences, and people who wouldn’t usually search for something like that, will indeed search for it as they have their curiosity aroused.

Do you think Google should be doing more about this? Or so you think that it’s down to users to change this?

Net66: Google Could Be Closing Authorship Program

Content WritingNot long ago the internet was alive with Google’s Authorship Program believing that it could revolutionise the already revolutionary exponential growth of Content Marketing.

The argument was that there was going to be an “Authorship rank”. And that this would be directly related to how often each author wrote, how many websites they wrote on and of course, relevant to how much quality was in the content.

These three factors would then be combined to give a rough estimate of the Rank of an Author. So if you have an author write a blog post on your website who is associated with only one other website and whilst they do write consistently, the quality isn’t great and it doesn’t get that much traffic, this might not be a big bonus to your website.

However if you get quite a few different authors who all publish great content on a couple of popular sites in your industry, and you get them to write for you, their Author Rank will pass onto your site, boosting your SEO.

Sadly, no one knows if this is the case or not. And now it looks like all that speculation was for naught. Google Authorship is set to be changing as we know it. The main reason for this seems to be participation, or rather, the lack of it. Not enough top quality authors are in the Authorship programme so to use authorship and author rank as ranking indicators could cause some pretty large and well known blogs to lose rankings because of it.

The good news however, is that Authorship markup still increases click through rates from the SERPs and the markup is here to stay. So if you STILL haven’t added Google Authorship to your blog, you need to.

Blog Post by Greg McVey

Google Doodle goes all Spooky for Halloween

Google usually celebrates special occasions by turning the large Google logo you can find on the home page into an topical image, game or an interactive graphic. This year in particular the interactive nature of Google’s Doodle has been upped quiet a lot. The graphic itself looks like the below:

Google Doodle Halloween

As you can see it features a witch and a cauldron and four ingredients. Each two ingredients you mix takes you to another screen where you play a little mini game or enjoy a wee graphic. Have you had fun with the google today?

This isn’t the first time Google has changed their logo for Halloween. In 2012 it featured a haunted street where you can go trick or treating! In 2011 as well they changed their logo but this time it displayed a time lapse of people from Google carving large pumpkins

Happy Halloween!

Net66 Google: Knowledge Graph Easter Eggs are Frighteningly Fun

Google has recently courted controversy with its open graph recently. But it’s back to it’s regular self today having fixed the error that was exploited yesterday.

Today we’ve seen a much different side to the Google knowledge graph. We’ve seen Google back to it’s little treats of Easter Eggs. An Easter Egg is a hidden feature or a bonus feature in digital media such as software, websites or DVDs. For example, when you type askew into Google, the screen tilts. Easter Eggs tend to be humorous in this way quite a lot with Google.

And you’ll find that they’ve this year added Easter Eggs into their Knowledge Graph results. For Example, see the image below:

Zombie Knowledge Graph

Thankfully for us, Google advises us on how to avoid zombies and even where their weak spots are. There’s also one for Vampires:

Vampire Knowledge Graph

There are lots more so, so get hunting for them!

Blog Post by Greg McVey

Net66 Google: Knowledge Graph Error Exploits Unfortunate Loophole

There’s a time and a place for serious Wikipedia entries. Apparently the World Series final (an all American baseball competition) is not one of these times. It seems that the Google knowledge graph draws at least some of it’s content from Wikipedia.

Wikipedia of course is the internet authority on life and is 100% accurate. I’m joking, although it is perceived to be that way. Wikipedia is user edited which does attest to it’s validity of being a useful website. You see the idea was, if you are a rocket scientist and a user of the website, you can add an article on rocket scientist. And if some young pretender makes an error in a rocket science related article, you can correct it.

What Wikipedia didn’t contend with was sports rivalries. As fans of opposing teams started to change rival’s entries on the website. The most high profile case of course being the infamous Thierry Henry handball incident. I won’t post what it was changed to, but it has something to do with the day after Monday and an appointment the week after.

The world series error is a little less full of profanity, and a little more childish. Never the less it still exploits a hole in Google’s knowledge graph that could let people down on subjects they want to read about. Especially when the subject itself is so topical.

See the image below:

google-knowledge-graph-cardinals-1383050678

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: The NoFollow Tag and Everything you Need to Know About it. [Infographic]

If you’re involved with SEO somehow, either as a technician or as a client, then you’ll have probably heard these two phrases get bandied about. NoFollow Lin and Follow Link. There is a difference in these links, the main one being that a follow link will allow link “juice” to flow through it. Whereas a nofollow link will not pass any juice on.

The reason that this is significant is that Google uses link juice to gauge how popular and how trusted it is. In the past it will have relied heavily on this but now, Google places much more emphasis on the quality of content and how your website can engage the user.

So, if you want to link to a website, but you don’t necessarily want to recommend it, you would use the NoFollow attribute. Below is a helpful infographic from Search Engine Land to help you know when (not) to use the nofollow attribute:

SearchEngineLand-Infographic

 

Blog Post by Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Bold or Strong? Which to use for SEO

Now this might seem a very picky question. But with SEO it’s the picky questions that can sometimes make a difference. You can be within Google’s Webmaster Guidelines by a hairline and something like this could tip you over that edge and start to harm your rankings.

Thankfully though, as both the tags are designed to simply make text bold, and it’s what the end user sees that counts with Google. There really is no difference either because strong text is strong and bold text is bold.

See Matt’s video below:

Net66 SEO: What Can I do about Keywords 100% Not Provided

google-analyticsYou may have heard the news doing the circuit on the SEO blogs that Google Analytics will no longer be providing keyword data. That is, of course, unless you’re willing to forego all your previous SEO work and switch to Paid Adverts a la Google Adwords. Failing that if you have a spare £90,000 per year lying around, you could easily afford Google Analytics Premium. Where “user privacy” – the reason Google are switching to (not provided) keywords – appears to be easily bought.

But we’re not here to gripe about who appears to be taking advantage of a monopoly position, we’re here to discuss what can be done to regain some useful data back from Google. See our top tips below:

Take Advantage of your Landing Pages

As we all know, one of the main keys in SEO is relevance. You want to optimise a specific page for each individual keyword. So now that you’ve done that, you’ll be able to look at which pages are the most relevant for each keyword. Through Google Analytics (It is still quite useful after all) if you navigate to Behaviour > Site Content > Landing Pages. This shows you a a list of your most popular landing pages and also just exactly how many hits you’re getting directly to them. Adding an advanced search to this will also help you narrow it down. If you add the secondary dimension as source and then search this for “Google”, it will show only the Google traffic to your landing pages.

Analysing the statistics from this section you’ll be able to discern which pages are performing better than others. For example our SEO services has more hits to it this month than our website design page. So from that it’s indicative we’re getting found more for SEO related keywords than web design keyword. Apply the same principle to your own clients’ analytics and you’ll be able to privide them with more accurate data.

Using Google Webmasters Tools

wmt-googleGoogle also offer a range of Webmasters Tools which help you produce a website worth of Google’s listings. In this set of tools you’ll find such things as the links Google have discovered to your site, which can prove an excellent link analysis tool. Especially when you consider that if you are ever to receive a link warning from them, they almost always refer to the links contained within webmaster.

But what we’re after here is the “keywords” section of Google Webmasters Tools. You can access it by clicking Search Engine > Search Queries. This will provide you with a list of your most popular queries and how many impressions you’ve made. You’ll also be able to see just how many clicks you’re getting from your impressions as well. This will give you some great data such as which pages appear for that search term the most as well as their average ranking positions in the search engines.

So although we might not be getting the best and most accurate data from Google Analytics anymore, there’s no need to panic massively as there’s still a lot you can do. Such as the above tips.

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Guest Blogging in Moderation is the Best Way

Matt CuttsOscar Wilde once said “Everything in Moderation is the key, including moderation”. Matt Cutts is no Oscar Wilde but he has come out with his own views on what should be carried out in moderation this week, which is Guest Blogging.

The reason for this is that he was asked how Google can distinguish between genuine guest blogs and paid links. And he went on to explain pretty much how the distinctions are made. Firstly, if there is a spam review, then a member of the webspam team will take a look at it. And as they’re a human they’ll be able to judge it correctly.

Anchor Text. A good indicator of a paid link is keyword rich anchor text. It might seem obvious now but people are still paying for keyword rich anchor text, especially if it’s a dofollow. If you’re writing a genuine guest post then you aren’t doing it for the anchor text, you’re writing it as you’re an expert on the subject and have a genuine passion for it. Due to this you’re much more likely to make links contextual.

Relevance. Identifying a genuine guest blog post is also helped by how relevant the post is to the rest of the website. If you’re a website looking for a guest post, you’re likely looking for an expert relevant in your industry. If you’re simply paying to get a blog post on that site, then in theory you’re only looking for the links you’ll be adding to your post and won’t care much about relevance. Indicating paid links.

Authorship. As a content writer you take pride in your work and want to receive the kudos, well deserved of course, that your writing inspires. As such, you’ll be wanting to write a bit about yourself at the end of any guest posts you do. You’ll probably also include a Google+ link and a link to your personal blog. If you were doing this for the links, a jot would not be given as long as the submitted article contained keyword rich anchor text. Again, indicative of paid links over genuine guest post.

So if you’re approached to write a guest post, keep this tips in mind when you’re writing. Otherwise you might get on the wrong end of Googles paid link detector. You an see Matt Cutts answer in full on the webmaster video below:

Blog Post by Greg McVey

Net66 News: Pinterest Launches Promoted Pins

Pinterest LogoPinterest has long been a big platform for businesses who specialise in visual and aesthetic practices. The reason being is that you can create your own boards that you can pin images too. There are a lot of reasons to do this and a lot of ways this can help in the marketing of your business.

Say you’re a cake maker, you can publish a pin of your latest cake and add to this image a note describing exactly how you made the cake, and the inspiration behind it. Pinterest was portrayed for a long while as being made up mostly of recipes by bloggers. And having spent time on that site, I can say that there were quite a few recipes out there.

But more and more businesses got on board with Pinterest as the audience grew on there. If you have an image of note, then you could get some major exposure.  This has now been recognised with the introduction of “Promoted Pins”. +1 for alliteration.

It works much in the same way that you’d promote a Facebook Post. You’d offer a payment and your pin will be shown in a prominent position to people with interests relevant to your industry. It seems quite popular as well with one study showing that 25% of online marketers polled said that they would be spending money on promoting pins on Pinterest.

Is your Business on Pinterest? Would you use Promoted Pins?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 SEO: Google Release New Penguin 2.1 (Penguin 5) Update

On Friday Google confirmed, via their perennial knight of webspam Matt Cutts, that they have released a new version of their Penguin Update. This update runs in tandem with Google’s new algorithm, Hummingbird, with their other significant update, Panda, also being integrated into the algorithm.

Now there is something to be cleared up here with a lot of people referring to Penguin 5, whilst others refer to it as Penguin 2.1. The reason being is that Google have released 5 Penguin updates, however, the fourth update was deemed too different from the third. So, Google decided to name it Penguin 2.0 as it was a pretty revolutionary and new update that was a cut above the previous Penguins.

But now we have Penguin 2.1. So what does this entail? Well the official release didn’t really give two much away. It was confirmed by Matt on his Twitter page with the tweet reading that Google have released the update and that it will affect around 1% of search queries. See the Tweet below:

The thing to notice here is the text “to a noticeable degree”. With Hummingbirds release it affected around 90% of searches on Google. But with that, the SEO industry only noted a slight change here or there and there were no mass scale fallouts of rankings for people. But this time, with the 1% being to a noticeable degree, that’s more likely to mean that there will be a higher degree of page one listings changing. Much more likely to draw attention from the SEO industry.

Penguin 2.1 does seem to have hit a lot of sites that have so far seemed to escape punishment by Google. After all, that’s the point of Penguin 2.1, to root out websites that are manipulating the search algorithm, specifically though bad link building practices.

It seems to have taken hold already with a lot of fluctuations in traffic and rankings being noted throughout the SEO industry, especially on the Webmaster World forums. Have you noticed any ups or downs in your traffic or rankings?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Net66 Google: Google Now Integrated with Knowledge Graph

There have been a lot of big updates form Google recently. Not least of which is the completely new algorithm they’ve introduced called Hummingbird. This Algorithm pays closer attention to sentences as a whole rather than noting which keywords are used and bringing up relevant results for them. This helps Google answer questions better when asked.

Another big update is the integration of two of Google’s most advanced search features. Their personalised search service Google Now and the Knowledge Graph. Personally I love Google Now, it practically second guesses me. I pull out my phone wondering when my next meeting is, and it’s first on the display of “Cards”.

But now Google are making this and even bigger feature as you can get Updates from people who have the Knowledge Graph Card. I.e. when you search for someone on Google and it brings up a little bio on the right hand side of the page, that’s the knowledge graph guessing at what you want and bringing up a snapshot of the information you’re after.

But if you’re running a search on a device with Google Now on it, then you get something extra. You get a little “Keep Me Updated” box that you can tick. So say you’re looking up Matt Cutts on a device that you have Google Now on, then you can tick a box to make sure next time he updates his blog, you’re notified. Perfect for the SEO on the go. See the below image:

Google Now and the Knowledge Graph

So, do you use Google Now? Who have you signed up with?

Blog Post by: Greg McVey

Image Courtesy of Search Engine Roundtable

Net66: Google Now Providing Web Design Tools

This week Google have launched their own HTML5 website design tool. Although in Beta at the moment, it already looks like a pretty handy tool. You can download it here. It seems the reason Google are now releasing this tool is down to the fact that, although a wonderful language, HTML5 has yet to be adopted and used in everyday web design.

One of the reasons for this is that you have to design three websites in effect. One for computers, one for tablets, and one for phones. The web design tool released by Google looks to tackle this problem head on with it’s easy and simple to use interface. Check out the demo below:

Blog Post by: Greg McVey